I'm Back

I haven't blogged in awhile because of spring break (which was fantastic) but, quite unfortunately, break is over... so I'm back to the blogging.

Over break, one of the books I read was The Happiness Project, by Gretchen Rubin.  This book is about Rubin spending a year working on her happiness.

Rubin is married and has two children and had a happy life.  One day, however, she decided to spend a year devoted to her happiness.  Each month focused on a different element of her happiness and had different resolutions.  For example, in January Rubin wanted to focus on her energy level.  She found ways to include more exercise into her day and go to bed earlier.  One month, Rubin started a blog, also called The Happiness Project.  I liked this book, and if I were older, I would have probably have been inspired to start my own.

I also saw a French Canadian movie over break called Starbuck.  I really liked this movie.  It had lots of really great lines and really memorable characters.  The one thing about the movie that kind of bothered me were that the subtitles are in white and sometimes they were hard to read because there would be an off-white background underneath them.  That is just a minor thing though.

Anyways, I recommend both The Happiness Project and Starbuck, so go to your library or the movie theater/video store.

Good Hair

I recently watched the documentary Good Hair to review for my media class.  I really enjoyed it and I wrote up a review on it, so please, read on.


When the daughter of the popular African American comedian Chris Rock asks him why she does not have “good hair,” he decides to go on a mission.  What exactly is “good hair” in the African American community?  Why is it so important for black women to have it?  What extremes will people go to to get “good hair”?  These questions are answered throughout Chris Rock’s documentary Good Hair.  This hilarious and well-made interactive documentary shows viewers a whole new side of hair.  Once the documentary begins, the viewer quickly realizes that Rock is not just examining black women’s hair styles, but issues of race, beauty, and self-image.  Black women want straight and flowing hair, or “white” hair.  He examines the different hair styles of black women, the costs and the talents needed to make them, and the forces behind the pressure to have “good hair.”  Rock looks at this issue with a wry sense of humor, making difficult topics funny and easy to discuss.
 

The movie’s main character is Chris Rock, himself.  He interviews African American celebrities, community leaders like Maya Angelou and Al Sharpton, and various women in beauty salons and men in barber shops, asking them about black women’s hair styles.  The celebrities say that the media pressures them and other women into having straighter, more flowing and more “beautiful” hair.  A group of students say that they feel the natural “nappy” hair would be unacceptable and out of place in a professional office.  The women in beauty salons say it is just something that everyone does and everyone should do.  Interestingly, black men in the barber shops do not seem to care about the women’s hair, but are confused by the price and commitment it requires.

The movie’s plot follows the methods of the black hair care industry and various ways in which African Americans style their hair to try to make it conform with what they see in magazines.

Rock first looks at chemical relaxer, which makes hair temporarily straight.  Going to a science lab, Rock learns that relaxer is made of an extremely poisonous chemical, sodium hydroxide, which can be blinding and burn the scalp.  Despite the pain it causes, women endure it.

Rock then looks at weaves, a method of sewing other people’s hair into pre-existing hair.  The entire process can take up to six hours and cost upward of $1,000.  Hair weaves are typically made from Indian hair.  The hair is shaved off the heads of Indian women in a religious ceremony called Tensure.  There is even a hair black market.

Interspersed through the movie, Rock follows an event called the Bronner Brothers’ annual hair competition in Atlanta, Georgia.  This trade show has hundreds of vendors selling various African American hair care products and features four competitors who each have 15 minutes to do a performance in which they style hair in a unique way.  This shows the money side of the industry.  The movie contends that there are only one or two black owned black hair care companies.  The others are owned by Koreans and Chinese.

The footage was shot on interview sets, in beauty salons, at the competition in Atlanta, and in India, where Rock goes to learn about the source of weaves.  The shots focus on both the people’s faces, as well as their hair, or what they are doing to someone else’s hair.  This helps to give perspective to the viewer and makes the viewer care more about what is happening.

Because of the filming locations, there are usually a lot of people in the shots at once.  This makes the movie very loud and energetic.  The diegetic sounds on busy streets and at the hair competition is very prominent.  The tone of the documentary is also very dynamic.  Rock has an upbeat personality and is always cracking jokes.  The music is always very lively and the film is shot under high-key lighting, making the atmosphere seem light and positive.

There are both strengths and weaknesses in Good Hair, mostly strengths though.  Rock tries hard, and succeeds, at making the documentary funny and engaging.  He also helps the viewer think about serious issues of race and beauty in a light way that one may.  The weaknesses are that sometimes the number of people on the set and the filming location make it difficult to hear what the people are saying – whether it have been because of the excessive background noise, people talking at the same time, or people talking too loudly or too quietly.  Another weakness I found is Rocks treatment of some of the issues is cursory. 

The ideas of conformity and what it means to be beautiful are displayed well in this film.  It allows the viewer to see the lengths some people will go to to fit in or be perceived in a certain way.  This movie is definitely worth seeing.  Its lively and light tone helps Rock get across a serious message about beauty.

Here is the trailer to Good Hair

 

 Good Hair, PG-13, 96 minutes, Chris Rock, 2009

Movie Review

I read a movie review of "Airplane!"  It was written by Janet Maslin in July of 1980 and published in the New York Times.

The review starts by talking about the energy that "Airplane!" has.  The writer states their opinion, calling the movie "clever and confident" as well as "furiously energetic."  The review slowly leads into a  brief synopsis of the plot and then it talks about some of the characters and their best moments in the movie.

Maslin weaves in the three aspects of film, literary, dramatic, and cinematic, by bringing up different actors and different scenes as the review and plot go on.  The review focuses most on the literary aspects of film.  It often mentions different characters, the plot, and the setting.

The tone of the movie review is lighthearted.  Maslin reccomends "Airplane!", as do I, and only speaks highly of the movie.

For our quarterly movie reviews I think we should be given some basic guidelines but mostly freedom.  Some suggested questions that we can touch on if we get stuck would be helpful; however, I think we should have more freedom than we have guidelines.

Here is a link to my annotated movie review: http://diigo.com/0ssum