Sunday, March 17, 2013

Why I Am Fed-Up With School Computers

So I know that last week I said I would be posting my documentary on my blog but when we were trying to export it the computer freaked out.

This wasn't the first time that I have had problems with a school computer while working on my documentary project, or any project at all for that matter.  While some of these problems may have been my fault/someone in my group's fault, some of them were also computer malfunctions.

Problems I have had that have not really hurt me include the computer just not logging me in, the computer taking a solid 20 minutes to log me in, the computer not logging me out, or the computer taking at least 10 minutes to do absolutely anything (open a document, go to the internet, go to a given website...)

Other problems that I have had have more affected my work.  During the documentary project, our project got saved to some random folder and it took us an hour to find it (this problem was probably self induced.)  Also, during the documentary project, we would try to render what we had made so far and it would take anywhere from 45 minutes to and hour.  Another time, I clicked on a document to open it and then all of the sudden the most high pitched, obnoxious beeping anyone could possibly imagine started happening.  We finally got it to stop by unplugging the computer - which obviously made us lose the most recent work we had done.

The most recent experience I had - which is why I am not posting my documentary on my blog this week - is that my group mate went in at lunch to export our documentary.  The computer said it would take an hour, so she left and went to class.  The next day, I went in at lunch to try to upload it to my blog and my group mate was still logged into the computer and there was a message up saying the export had failed.  Not only was this extremely frustrating, but I had to make sure that the documentary was not altered in anyway.  I know that maybe had she stayed something could have been done - but everyone in our group had class.

This entire experience has been very frustrating, but for some reason I am still looking forward to our next video project.  I will probably begin posting about it soon so...

This is a picture of a Final Cut Pro screen - the program we use to edit our videos

Image Source: Final Cut

Saturday, March 9, 2013

A Not So Short Reflection on My Documentary



           This post is a reflection on the documentary making process.  We will have ours finished and exported by Thursday, so expect to see it on my blog next week!  If you click on the documentary project label that I put with this post, you can see all the other posts I have done on it.

            My group filmed a documentary about the closed lunch policy at Blair.  Blair has always had a closed-campus, meaning students are not allowed to leave campus during the school day.  Recently the school engaged the support of the restaurants near Blair to enforce this policy.  Now the restaurants will not serve Blair students during the school day.

            We interviewed the principal and the head security guard at Blair, as well as students.  Unfortunately, we did not have the opportunity to interview many of the managers of the restaurants in the nearby Woodmoor shopping center.  We did interview an employee at Santucci’s Italian Deli, however he did not want to go on camera; and we did not have time to interview employees at the other stores.  Our documentary would be stronger and more complete if we had been able to include the stores’ perspectives.

            From making this documentary I learned how much pre-production planning really needs to be done.  Before making the documentary I did not have any idea about what to expect.  We knew what our topic was and who we wanted to interview, but we had no idea about what direction to go in.  While we were planning what to ask in our interviews we did not consider how the questions would play into our documentary.  While we were editing, we still had no clear idea of what we were doing.  I think that we would have had a much easier time had we dedicated ourselves to more planning.

            I also learned the importance of selecting a topic, as well as group members.  I was not particularly interested in the topic of closed lunch and I feel as if the topic was a challenging one for first time documentary makers to take on.  In relation to group members, I learned that sometimes it is not necessarily easy to work with your friends.  While in the end we did complete our documentary, at times we got distracted.  Not only that, but the work load was not evenly distributed.  It would have been more advantageous to me to choose a group that would have worked well together to complete the project.  If I were to do this project again, I would have chosen a topic that more so captured my interest.

            Aside from our lack of planning, general confusion, and various computer malfunctions throughout the project, we only really had one major problem.  We planned to test the enforcement of Blair’s closed lunch policy and film it for our documentary.  We had approval from our principal and our parents.  The plan was to go to one of the local restaurants for lunch, filming ourselves through the process of leaving campus and either being served food or denied service.  Our teacher was going to accompany us.  Unfortunately, the assistant principal did not allow us to do this.  We instead filmed ourselves pretending to leave campus.  It would have been more interesting had we actually been able to test the policy.

            All in all, I think our teacher did a good job of helping to guide us through this project.  There are, however, a few things that could be done differently next year.  In pre-production it may be helpful to have each group submit a script of what they anticipate their documentary to look like and then submit a revised or updated script during the production phase.  Also, during the production phase it may be helpful to establish stricter checkpoint deadlines for the students, for example, music by X date and a rough cut by Y date, and to be more readily available after school if the students need to borrow a camera.  I liked that there was time for research in class and that checkpoints were given to us with the research (three note cards by Monday, for example).  During the production phase, I appreciated the feedback we received on our documentary, including the advice on things like what shots to keep or not keep and where we should put different pieces of b-roll.  I also appreciate that we are allowed to continue working on our documentaries on our own time for an extra week.  It is really helpful to make up for time lost because of technical difficulties and such.

            All things considered, I think this project was a good experience.  It taught me the importance of planning and making sure everyone is dedicated to the project.  Even though the topic of our documentary was not my first choice, I still enjoyed learning about something in my school and hearing different people’s opinions.

Sunday, March 3, 2013

Saying Goodbye To The Ombudsman

 
This is Patrick Pexton (Sorry if this doesn't show up very well/at all on my blog)

Earlier this morning I read Patrick Pexton's final ombudsman column in The Washington Post.  He has been working there as ombudsman for around two years.

For those who you who don't know, the ombudsman is the  person who works for a newspaper that communicates with the readers and responds to their questions/complaints in a weekly column.

Pexton is leaving The Post because they no longer have the money to keep an ombudsman - so with the leaving of Pexton is the leaving of the ombudsman column at The Post.

Pexton's salary was that of a senior editor - so a good chunk of money a year - but with the rising popularity of the internet and new technologies and the decline of people actually reading newspapers, it is harder to keep funds coming in.

The ombudsman is special to the readers as well.  The ombudsman helps the readers get their voices heard.  They respond to readers' concerns.  They talk about different moral issues from the newspaper's point of view and can explain certain decisions the newspaper has made.

As a side note, that is sort of still on topic: Earlier this year, Patrick Pexton came and talked to the CAP Program that I am in about his position.

Click here to read a short description of Pexton and his ombudsman position.  It also has links to his articles underneath.
Click here to read the some of the reasons why The Post ended their ombudsman column.
Click here to read Pexton's final ombudsman column.

Image Source: Patrick Pexton